Immigration: it costs both Sides.
Immigration. It is one of the most contraverisal political concepts in our current era. Some people completely despise immigration and would like to commit to a full "remigration" whilst others would wish to fully keep the system as is, and simply provide more support and resources to migrants. However there is a viewpoint, which has barely been explored: The perspective of the countries which the migrants were from.
In this essay I''ll be exploring the other side of the coin, and go fully 180 degrees back onto why Immigration, when unchecked, is bad for both the country receiving the migrants and the country of the migrants' origin.
Let's start with some context. Immigration as a concept has always existed, and was not a terrible idea at all. We see some of the first instances of immigration in human history being well... in the earliest eras of human history. Usually and commonly in these time periods, immigration (or rather just migration) was a force of good. These things however would begin to be used en masse once the discovery of the new world (The Americas, and other discovered lands) took place, as these new lands needed to be settled by people (who were Europeans). Eventually this would develop into a system in the West trying to integrating people far and wide from the world; which in recent times has been very contraversial policy.
Here is the interesting thing - Nobody, not those who oppose or are for mass migration - ever mention the story of the consequences of migration. To put it into perspective, we'll use the country of Bulgaria as an example of how mass immigration ruins countries. Bulgaria in 1991 used to have 11 million people, with a disapora of 12 million total. In 2026, in Bulgaria there are only 5 million people, yet there is still a strong disapora of ~11 million across the world. This means over 6 million Bulgarians, wether out of economic incentives or other reasons (Though for this case study, it is mostly because of the economic incentives) have left Bulgaria. This may not sound bad until you consider the possibility that these people might not have willingly left Bulgaria. For example, fresh university students being pulled out of their university to go into Western countries, and be forced to stay there and work mindlessly as free labour for a corporation instead of creating their own business and giving less incentives to leave Bulgaria. This is just one of many tactics used by Western countries.
This is a common pheonomon, where nowdays people don't leave and immigrate to their countries without reason or for adventure, but instead are taken by foreign corporations, migration programmmes, etc. for the promise of a better life. This can be seen very clearly with the blatant enslavement of South Asians within the Gulf States of Saudi Arabia, U.A.E., Qatar, and others, whom too were promised having better lives if they were to move away from home and migrate to the Arabian states. The only thing is that they did not read the contract and their passports are now confiscated, and now ~21 million of them are now forced to slave away in physical labour for the Gulf States - whom themselves could simply make their native populations to go to work, instead of hiring free labour from abroad. These 21 million South Asians could have been working to improve their own countries, developing businesses, improving the economy of South Asia, labour away to improve their collective rights, and so much more, instead of selling their souls to Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Quatar, UAE, and the other Gulf States which exploit them for very low wages.
Therefore, If this system of immigration that has caused the suffering of 21 million South Asians to be condemned to wage slavery in the Gulf States, just because they were sold lies about getting a better life - does that mean we can draw comparisons to how the West seems to always entice people from all over the world to come and work for them?
This opens a new theory that I want to share because I it might be true. Those countries which are making thousands of immigrations come in - Canada, UK, USA, Germany, France, etc. - are all commiting in neo-colonialism by forcing and giving either real or fake incentives to desperate and struggling people in poor countries and effectively kidnapping them for free usable labour, as instead of using their welfare system to support their own populations to get to work, they will simply import their labour because it's cheaper. This was the exact system that slavery worked under, which the Left-wing is so focused on about Black rights and such, yet ignore the enslavement of the world's population to the west? As for the Right-wing, they say that they need to care for their own country and state, yet ignore to ensure that the world's populations dare care about their own countries and become nationalists of their own homelands so that the right wing's view of immigration is solved?? What we have here is a paradox. We can see that there is a clear answer to what modern immigration is - Mostly kidnapping of desperate peoples from poorer countries; effectively brain-draining the world of all it's knowledge via H1B programmes and such to steal the intellectuals for the west's benefit - and yet both sides of the political compass ignore this core feature of modern immigration?
Futhermore, circling back, this kidnapping of the world's populations is bad for the countries which import them in the first place, as their own native populations will feel more emphaized to fall to extremism. This is because the modern immigration system has also another, very major issue. It used to work properly because of this concept - It used to integrate very well. Within the US alone, there are millions of Americans who never knew they were actually Italian, Irish or whatever, but instead pure blooded Americans. This cannot be said for the current Hispanic populations and the current Middle Eastern populations which are the largest immigration groups in America so far - will not integrate. This is because the Integration System has been eroded, decayed and made hollow on the inside - thanks to neglect, abuse of loopholes, etc. aswell as overall woke culture prioritising the upkeep of one's identity and feelings, even when they want to become a citizen of the country. The failure of the ingration system might be the only reason why Immigration is such an issue to begin with, as if it was not hollow, the millions of migrants in these countries would have integrated properly into their host countries.
Therefore in conclusion, what is my arugment? My argument is that immigration is an easy loophole which people use to escape their situation and (unless are genuinely in need of) are then kidnapped or put themselves into the host countries to slave away in corporations or physical labour as to supply for the fact that the host country won't dare to improve their own education system to fix the issue. I may have not developed my ideas fully within this single post, but I have explained apart of them here.